ROGUESBOOK CASE

Lockett v. Ohio

Capital sentencers generally must be allowed to consider any aspect of a defendant’s character, record, or offense offered as mitigation.

0 documented connections

Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court death-penalty decision concerning mitigating evidence in capital sentencing.

Background

The case reached the Supreme Court through a capital prosecution and required the justices to define how constitutional protections apply when a state seeks or carries out a death sentence. It sits within the modern line of cases interpreting the Eighth Amendment and, where relevant, the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Supreme Court ruling

Capital sentencers generally must be allowed to consider any aspect of a defendant’s character, record, or offense offered as mitigation.

Why it matters

The decision became part of the operating constitutional framework for American capital punishment. Later courts, defense lawyers, prosecutors and corrections agencies have had to account for its rule when evaluating death eligibility, sentencing procedure or execution protocols.

Citation

438 U.S. 586 (1978) — decided 1978-07-03.

Sources

– U.S. Supreme Court — Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978) (opinion via Justia)

References

  1. [1]Lockett v. Ohio, 438 U.S. 586 (1978)Tier 1
    U.S. Supreme Court via Justia
    MentionsSupports
    View source ↗