ROGUESBOOK CASE

Furman v. Georgia

Death sentences imposed under then-existing schemes were unconstitutional because their application was arbitrary and capricious.

0 documented connections

Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972), is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court death-penalty decision concerning arbitrary death sentencing under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Background

The case reached the Supreme Court through a capital prosecution and required the justices to define how constitutional protections apply when a state seeks or carries out a death sentence. It sits within the modern line of cases interpreting the Eighth Amendment and, where relevant, the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments.

Supreme Court ruling

Death sentences imposed under then-existing schemes were unconstitutional because their application was arbitrary and capricious.

Why it matters

The decision became part of the operating constitutional framework for American capital punishment. Later courts, defense lawyers, prosecutors and corrections agencies have had to account for its rule when evaluating death eligibility, sentencing procedure or execution protocols.

Citation

408 U.S. 238 (1972) — decided 1972-06-29.

Sources

– U.S. Supreme Court — Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972) (opinion via Justia)

References

  1. [1]Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (1972)Tier 1
    U.S. Supreme Court via Justia
    MentionsSupports
    View source ↗